TRADE OPENNESS, FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NIGERIA (Record no. 8653)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02404nam a22001457a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 250716b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--AUTHOR
Author OLUSHOLA TEMINIJESU OLAYIDE
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title TRADE OPENNESS, FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NIGERIA
250 ## - SUPERVISOR
Supervisor Dr. Ademola Obafemi Young
260 ## - IMPRINT
Place of publication Mountain Top University
Department (College) Economics
Date of publication 2024
300 ## - COLLATION
Pagination 79p
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Nigeria's economy experienced broad-based and sustained growth of over 7.00% on average between 2000 and 2014. However, from 2015 till date, the nation’s growth has declined substantially, entering a recession in 2016 and 2020. For instance, her gross domestic Product (GDP) growth, which was 2.65% in 2015 fell to -1.62% in 2016 and later to -1.79% in 2020 before surging to 3.65% and 3.25% in 2021 and 2022, respectively. This study investigated the impact of trade openness and FDI on economic growth in Nigeria from 1990-2022. Based on the framework of endogenous growth theory, the study utilized the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Bounds test approach and the Fully Modified Ordinary Least Square (FMOLS) for estimation. The ARDL technique was adopted after the unit root test results showed the order of integration of I(0) and I(1). Moreover, the long-run cointegration test was conducted using bounds cointegration analysis. This method was adopted after a thorough assessment of the time series properties of the model's variables. Data used for analysis was retrieved from the World Bank's world development indicators and Penn World Table. The findings from the project indicated that trade openness and foreign direct investment had an indirect impact on economic growth in Nigeria. However, the impact was only significant for Trade Openness in the short run as was<br/>shown in objective one. In objective three the negative sign was maintained for both variables. Nevertheless, Trade openness was statistically significant in the long run and marginally significant in the short run. Whereas, foreign direct investment was marginally significant in both the short run and the long run. The implication of the findings revealed that trade openness has not been beneficial to the economy of Nigeria. Therefore, the government should take a second look at the trade policies.Keywords: Trade openness, foreign direct investment, economic growth, Nigeria
650 ## - TRACINGS
Main Subject Economics
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Books
Holdings
Source of classification or shelving scheme Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Accen. No. Koha item type
    Main Library Main Library 16.07.2025 20020301010 Books

Powered by Koha